Meghan Markle received another round of condemnation from the netizens over a report claiming she's entitled to speak up because she's a "self-made woman."

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have maintained their silence following the release of Omid Scobie's "Endgame." They have been dragged into the controversial book because of the claims made in the book and because the author is allegedly their unofficial "mouthpiece."

An unnamed insider recently spoke with The Telegraph and claimed that Markle "seemed to feel like she had more of a right to speak" than the Princess of Wales -- who married to the royal family as someone unknown -- and allegedly "regarded herself as a philanthropist who could teach the royals a thing or two about charity." 

Markle also reportedly felt "she was a self-made woman whereas Kate hadn't really had her own career."

The report raised eyebrows, with many users on X, formerly Twitter, reacting negatively. Many slammed Markle for the alleged claim, and several questioned what she really accomplished.

"What exactly has Meghan accomplished in [sic] her own?" one asked. Another wrote, "Self-made victim."

"The word you are looking for is Jealousy. She was jealous of everything, Catherine. From her husband, the Heir, to knowing she will one day be Queen consort. And Megz will always be a 2nd rate bad actor who picked up the SPEAR thinking he was a lot richer than he really was," a third user opined.

"Self-made? Really? TBH, I think Kate works a lot harder than she does or did," a Middleton supporter commented.

Meanwhile, some defended the Duchess of Sussex from the criticisms. They speculated that the report was from the Palace since it wanted to deflect the issue.

"Being on many seasons of a highly rated TV show, being invited to the UN not because of who her spouse or parent is but for her work and influencing advertorial policy at 12," one replied to those asking about Markle's accomplishments.

"Poor haters, her resume is bigger and longer than yours. Sorry, she made millions working as an actress. And not following a Prince around for decades. Hint: Camilla and Kate both. I'd be mad at M too," another Sussex supporter added.

"Hahaha, the Royal Family have [sic] negative headlines at the moment so, as expected, out come the negative Meghan articles to deflect/distract. Which palace member gave this story?!" a third person claimed.

"Are you for real? It's 2023 in the UK, [and] we aint living in the 50s in the deep south, Meghan has as much right as anyone to have a voice, shame waity Katie still can't string a sentence together, Meghan is head and shoulders against #Kkkate," a fourth person wrote.

Meanwhile, former BBC journalist Tom Bower weighed in on the attacks against Middleton in Omid Scobie's newest book "Endgame." The Sussexes were dragged into the controversies mentioned in the publication because the author was allegedly Harry and Meghan's "mouthpiece."

The British journalist and investigative reporter felt the words against the Duchess of Cambridge were from her estranged sister-in-law. In the book, Scobie called Middleton a part-time working royal, "cold" and "Katie Keen."

"I do find his attack on Kate really gratuitous because that is very much Meghan speaking," Bower said.