Angelina Jolie just expressed her dismay and anger on Donald Trump's latest immigration policies which led to limiting travellers to enter America. The actress, despite her divorce drama with Brad Pitt, criticized the US President for the strict order regarding the immigration.

Jolie penned an op-ed which was later published in New York Times and it was evident how she feels so disappointed with the travel ban. The actress has been a special envoy of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and she has in fact visited many times Syrian refugees.

According to E! News, Angelina mentioned in her article that the sudden decision to stop resettlement of refuges in the United States and the deny of entry to the major Muslim countries is not right. The suspension, according to her was met with shock around the world because of what will it imply later.

Angelina Jolie is a mother of six kids who were born from different countries. She also wrote something as an added concern for their future following the travel ban. She has this desire to have this country safe for the children and those refugee children who qualify for asylum would also be given the right to plead their case to the US.

Even if her father, John Voight expressed his support for President Trump, the actress did not waste any time to make a stance on the president. With this, she added that the government should know how to balance its international responsibilities without compromising on the needs of its citizens as per The Guardian.

Moreover, what is more remarkable on her opinion editorial is when she mentioned that the response for this issue should be based on facts and not on fear. For the record, Angelina Jolie has been the latest star to have spoken out against Trump's immigration policies.

Angelina Jolie might be undergoing gruelling divorce case right now but that did not stop her from fulfilling her duties as special envoy of the UN for the refugees. Her article that expressed her dismay over Donald Trump's immigration policies is just a proof.